THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. THE VILLIAPALLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court of Kerala ordered the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court of Kerala. The Revenue subsequently filed a memo to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the Revenue.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 9TH MAGHA, 1942 ITA.No.173 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 532/Coch/2017 DATED 20-06-2018 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SR.STANDING COUNSEL,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT SRI. K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: M/S. THE VILLIAPALLY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD VILLIAPALLY, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE-673 001 R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.RAGHUNATH R1 BY ADV. SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
I.T.Appeal No.173/19 -:2:- JUDGMENT Dated this the 29th day of January, 2021 S.V.Bhatti
, J. Memo dated 14.01.2021 filed by Sri.Christopher Abraham, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department to withdraw the appeal is ordered. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sri.Christopher Abraham draws our attention to the judgment of this Court in I.T.A. No.74 of 2016 dated 11.11.2019 and states that refund of proportionate court fee, taking into consideration the memo filed to withdraw the appeal etc., has been granted. Refund of proportionate court fee is ordered. Hence the Registry makes refund of court fee to the extent admissible in law. Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI JUDGE Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps
I.T.Appeal No.173/19 -:3:- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 03.02.2016. ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 15.06.2017 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS). ANNEXURE C TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.06.2018 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026