THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARE KARKANE NIYAMIT
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court quashed the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed appeals against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order. The appeals were consolidated with other related appeals.
What were the issues?
The core issue was the correctness of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order, which was set aside and remanded for reconsideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA
I.T.A No.100012/2016 C/W I.T.A. No.100013/2016, I.T.A. No.100014/2016, I.T.A. No.100015/2016, I.T.A. No.100016/2016 & I.T.A. No.100017/2016
ITA NO.100012/2016
BETWEEN:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
OPP: CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,
BIJAPUR. ..... APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE KARKHANE NIYAMIT, RANNA NAGAR, TIMMAPUR-587122, MUDHOL TALUK, DIST: BAGALKOT. KARNATAKA. ..... RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRAKASH BADIGER, SRI MANOJ D PUKALE & SRI H.R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVs.)
: 2 : THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.152/PNJ/2015, DTD:04.08.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BIJAPUR AND ETC.
ITA NO.100013/2016
BETWEEN:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
OPP: CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,
BIJAPUR. ..... APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE KARKHANE NIYAMIT, RANNA NAGAR, TIMMAPUR-587122, MUDHOL TALUK, DIST: BAGALKOT. KARNATAKA. ..... RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRAKASH BADIGER, SRI MANOJ D PUKALE, ADV. & SRI H.R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADV.)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.153/PNJ/2015, DTD:04.08.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BIJAPUR AND ETC.
: 3 : ITA NO.100014/2016
BETWEEN:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
OPP: CIVIL HOSPITAL,
BELAGAVI.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,
BIJAPUR. ..... APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE KARKHANE NIYAMIT, RANNA NAGAR, TIMMAPUR-587122, MUDHOL TALUK, DIST: BAGALKOT. KARNATAKA. ..... RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRAKASH BADIGER, SRI MANOJ D PUKALE, ADV. & SRI H.R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADV.)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.154/PNJ/2015, DTD:04.08.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BIJAPUR AND ETC.
ITA NO.100015/2016
BETWEEN:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
OPP: CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI.
: 4 :
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1,
BAGALKOT. ..... APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE KARKHANE NIYAMIT, RANNA NAGAR, TIMMAPUR-587122, MUDHOL TALUK, DIST: BAGALKOT. KARNATAKA. ..... RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRAKASH BADIGER, SRI MANOJ D PUKALE & SRI H.R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVs.
THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.155/PNJ/2015, DTD:04.08.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, WARD-1, BAGALKOT AND ETC.
ITA NO.100016/2016
BETWEEN:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
OPP: CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI.
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD-1, BAGALKOT. ..... APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE
: 5 : KARKHANE NIYAMIT, RANNA NAGAR, TIMMAPUR-587122, MUDHOL TALUK, DIST: BAGALKOT. KARNATAKA. ..... RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRAKASH BADIGER, SRI MANOJ D PUKALE & SRI H.R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVs)
THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.156/PNJ/2015, DTD:04.08.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, WARD-1, BAGALKOT AND ETC.
ITA NO.100017/2016
BETWEEN:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
OPP: CIVIL HOSPITAL,
BELAGAVI.
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD-1, BAGALKOT. ..... APPELLANTS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
RYATAR SAHAKARI SAKKARRE KARKHANE NIYAMIT, RANNA NAGAR, TIMMAPUR-587122, MUDHOL TALUK, DIST: BAGALKOT. KARNATAKA. ..... RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRAKASH BADIGER, SRI MANOJ D PUKALE, & SRI H.R. KAMBIYAVAR, ADVs)
: 6 : THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.157/PNJ/2015, DTD:04.08.2015 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, WARD-1, BAGALKOT AND ETC.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Mr. Y.V. Raviraj, learned counsel for the revenue. Mr. Prakash Badiger, learned counsel for the assessee. For the reasons assigned by us in the order passed today in I.T.A.Nos.100111-100120/2015, the impugned order dated 04.08.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is hereby quashed and the matter is remitted to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal afresh for decision in accordance with law. Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Naa
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026