COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SPIRIT INFRADEVLOPERS
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court decided the common question of law against the appellant (revenue) and in favour of the respondent (assessee). Therefore, the same outcome applies to these appeals.
What were the facts?
The appeals concern Assessment Years 2011-12 and involve common questions of law. The facts in these appeals are identical to those in ITA 191/2018.
What were the issues?
The appeals revolve around a common question of law that was decided against the revenue in a related case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA 191/2018
Pg. 1 of 2
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgement reserved on: 09.02.2023 %
Judgement pronounced on : 18.07.2023
+ ITA 192/2018
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
SPIRIT INFRADEVELOPERS
..... Respondent
+ ITA 193/2018
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
SPIRIT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD.
..... Respondent
+ ITA 198/2018
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
versus
SPIRIT GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD ..... Respondent
Present: Mr Kunal Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms Zehra Khan, Jr. Standing Counsel with Mr S. Bhattacharya, Adv. for appellant. Mr S. Krishnan and Mr Amandeep Mehta, Advs. for the respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.:
The above-captioned appeals concern Assessment Years (AYs) 2011- 12. 2. On 09.02.2023, we indicated that the facts which obtain in the above- Digitally Signed By:ATUL JAIN Signing Date:19.07.2023 15:13:09 Signature Not Verified
ITA 191/2018
Pg. 2 of 2
captioned appeals are pari materia with the facts that arise in ITA 191/2018. 2.1. It was also submitted by the counsels for the parties that the decision taken in the said appeal i.e., ITA 191/2018, would also apply to the above- captioned appeals. 3. Since, in ITA 191/2018, we have decided the common question of law arising in ITA 191/2018 and the above-captioned appeals against the appellant/revenue and in favour of the respondent/assessee, the same fate will follow in these appeals as well. It is ordered accordingly. 4. The appeals are, accordingly, closed.
(RAJIV SHAKDHER) JUDGE
(TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
JULY 18th, 2023
Digitally Signed By:ATUL JAIN Signing Date:19.07.2023 15:13:09 Signature Not Verified
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026