COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)- 2, DELHI vs. M/S MICHELIN GLOBAL MOBILITY S.A.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. This was based on the circular dated 17.09.2024, which stipulates a threshold limit for tax effect.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an ITAT order for Assessment Years 2015-16 and 2016-17. The appeal was filed after a delay, which was condoned.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be entertained given the tax effect was below the threshold limit specified in the relevant circular.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 284/2024 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)- 2, DELHI
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Gibran Naushad, Junior Standing Counsel & Ms. Sakashi Shairwal, Junion Standing Counsel.
versus
M/S MICHELIN GLOBAL MOBILITY S.A. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ananya Kapoor for Mr. Salil Kapoor & Mr. Sumit Lal, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R %
26.09.2024 CM APPL. 28960/2024 (condonation of delay in re-filing the present income tax appeal) 1. For the reasons as stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay in re-filing the income tax appeal is condoned. 2. The application is disposed of accordingly. ITA 284/2024 3. The Revenue has filed the present appeal, impugning the order dated 15.12.2022, passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, in ITA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/10/2024 at 11:48:58
No. 1962/DEL/2020, for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The impugned order is a common order passed in two appeals preferred by the Revenue, for the Assessment Years 2015-16 and 2016-17. 4. It has been pointed out that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the threshold limit of ₹2 crores, as stipulated in the circular dated 17.09.2024. The learned counsels also do not dispute that the subject matter does not fall in any of the exceptions, as provided in the said circular. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed, on account of low tax effect.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 at
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/10/2024 at 11:48:58
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026