PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 LUDH vs. M/S LOTUS INTEGRATED TAXPARK LTD COMPLEX HANDIAYA ROAD DHAULA BARNALA

PDF · subscribers
ITA/155/2016HC Punjab & HaryanaPHHC01110341201603 October 2024Bench: MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in light of the revised monetary limits for filing appeals.

What were the facts?

The Revenue sought to withdraw its appeal before the ITAT. This was based on a Circular issued by the CBDT enhancing monetary limits for filing appeals. The current appeal's tax effect was below the revised threshold.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue could withdraw its appeal based on a subsequent circular enhancing monetary limits for filing appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Not explicitly mentioned, but related to appeal filing procedures and monetary limits.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

ITA-155-2016 ( 136 IN T

PR COMMISS M/S LOTUS IN DHAULA BA CORAM: H

H Present: M

f SANJEEV PR

1.

Counsel Governm Board o limits fo Court a Circular with the b fi af S 1 2 (O&M)

Page 1 of 2 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH

SIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 LUD Vs. NTEGRATED TAXPARK LTD C RNALA **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJA **** Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Sr. Standing C Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Jr. Standing Co for the appellant/Revenue. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) l for the appellant submits that in t ment of India, Ministry of Finance of Direct Taxes dated 17.09.2024 for filing of the appeals by the de and SLPs before the Supreme C r No.5/2024 has been amended an e purpose to manage litigations: “ 2. As a step towards manag been decided by the Board to revise filing of appeals in Income-tax cases a aforementioned Circular as follows: Sl. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax 1. Before Income Tax Appella 2. Before High Court B AND HARYANA AT H ITA-155-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.10.2024 DHIANA . . . . Appellant COMPLEX HANDIAYA ROAD . . . . Respondent EEV PRAKASH SHARMA AY VASHISTH Counsel with ounsel terms of the Circular issued by the e, Department of Revenue, Central bearing No.9/2024, the monetary epartment before the ITAT, High Court has been enhanced and the d following steps have been taken gement of litigation, it has e the monetary limits for as stated in Para 4.1 of the x matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) te Tribunal 60 lakh 2 crore

) 4 t t e l y h e n MOHIT GOYAL 2024.10.14 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

ITA-155-2016 ( 3 r in 1 5 s m 2. The mo Circular filed be the app which h 3. In view not fall prays fo 4. Accordi withdraw 5. All pend

October 03, 202 Mohit goyal 1. Whether 2. Whether (O&M)

Page 2 of 2 3. Before Supreme Court

3.

Monetary limits given in regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be ncluding those relating to TDS/TCS u 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3. 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the d shall be taken on merits, without regar monetary limits.”

odifications have come into effe r i.e. 17.09.2024, and therefore s fore the Supreme Court, High Cou eals pending before the Supreme have been directed to be withdrawn of aforesaid Circular No.09/2024 within the exception clause of Ci or withdrawal of the present appeal ingly, we allow the prayer as abov wn. ding applications also stand dismis

(SAN 24 speaking/reasoned?

Y reportable?

Y 5 crore paragraph 2 above with e applicable to all cases under the Income-tax Act, .1 and 3.2 of Circular No decision to appeal/file SLP rd to the tax effect and the ect from the date of issuance of shall apply to SLPs/appeals to be urt and Tribunal and also apply to Court, High Court and Tribunal, n. dated 17.09.2024, as the case does ircular No.5/2024, learned counsel . ve, and the appeal is dismissed as sed as withdrawn accordingly. NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No

f e o , s l s MOHIT GOYAL 2024.10.14 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →