What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal allowed the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in light of the revised monetary limits and the circular's provisions for managing litigation.

The Revenue sought to withdraw an appeal before the High Court based on a new circular enhancing monetary limits for filing appeals. The circular, dated 17.09.2024, revised these limits for appeals before the ITAT, High Court, and Supreme Court.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be withdrawn based on a revised monetary limit for filing appeals by the Revenue. The applicability of the new circular to pending appeals was considered.

PCIT vs M/S Orient Craft Ltd | Punjab & Haryana High Court 2024

ITA-142-2022 ( 136 IN T

THE PRINCIP GURUGRAM M/S ORIENT CORAM: H

H Present: M

SANJEEV PR

Counsel Governm Board o limits fo Court a Circular with the b fi af S 1 2 (O&M)

Page 1 of 2 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH

PAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOM

Vs. CRAFT LTD **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJA **** Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing C for the appellant/Revenue. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) l for the appellant submits that in t ment of India, Ministry of Finance of Direct Taxes dated 17.09.2024 for filing of the appeals by the de and SLPs before the Supreme C r No.5/2024 has been amended an e purpose to manage litigations: “ 2. As a step towards manag been decided by the Board to revise filing of appeals in Income-tax cases a aforementioned Circular as follows: Sl. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-tax 1. Before Income Tax Appella 2. Before High Court B AND HARYANA AT H ITA-142-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.10.2024 ME TAX, ( CENTRAL) . . . . Appellant . . . . Respondent EEV PRAKASH SHARMA AY VASHISTH Counsel terms of the Circular issued by the e, Department of Revenue, Central bearing No.9/2024, the monetary epartment before the ITAT, High Court has been enhanced and the d following steps have been taken gement of litigation, it has e the monetary limits for as stated in Para 4.1 of the x matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) te Tribunal 60 lakh 2 crore

) 4 t t e l y h e n MOHIT GOYAL 2024.10.14 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

ITA-142-2022 ( 3 r in 1 5 s m 2. The mo Circular filed be the app which h 3. In view not fall prays fo 4. Accordi withdraw 5. All pend

October 03, 202 Mohit goyal 1. Whether 2. Whether (O&M)

Page 2 of 2 3. Before Supreme Court

Monetary limits given in regard to filing appeal/SLP shall be ncluding those relating to TDS/TCS u 1961 with exceptions as per paras 3. 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where the d shall be taken on merits, without regar monetary limits.”

odifications have come into effe r i.e. 17.09.2024, and therefore s fore the Supreme Court, High Cou eals pending before the Supreme have been directed to be withdrawn of aforesaid Circular No.09/2024 within the exception clause of Ci or withdrawal of the present appeal ingly, we allow the prayer as abov wn. ding applications also stand dismis

(SAN 24 speaking/reasoned?

Y reportable?

Y 5 crore paragraph 2 above with e applicable to all cases under the Income-tax Act, .1 and 3.2 of Circular No decision to appeal/file SLP rd to the tax effect and the ect from the date of issuance of shall apply to SLPs/appeals to be urt and Tribunal and also apply to Court, High Court and Tribunal, n. dated 17.09.2024, as the case does ircular No.5/2024, learned counsel . ve, and the appeal is dismissed as sed as withdrawn accordingly. NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No

f e o , s l s MOHIT GOYAL 2024.10.14 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), GURUGRAM vs. M/S ORIENT CRAFT LTD.

What did the High Court hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments