What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. The court noted that the appeal did not fall within any exceptions to the revised monetary limits specified in the circular.

The Income Tax Department filed an appeal before the High Court. The appeal was based on a revised circular from the Ministry of Finance regarding monetary limits for filing appeals. The department sought to withdraw the appeal based on this circular.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn based on revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department as per a government circular.

PCIT vs Ms Symbiosis Pharmaceuticals Pvt… | Punjab & Haryana High Court 2024

127 IN

PRINCIPAL C M/S. SYMBIO

CORAM: H

Present: M M a f

* SANJEEV PR

C bearing No.9 Ministry of Fi the monetary ITAT, High C enhanced and have been tak d a a S 1 2 3 N THE HIGH COURT OF PU CHANDIG I D COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OSIS PHARMACEUTICALS PVT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Senior Stan Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Junior Standi and Ms. Muskaan Gupta, Advoca for the appellant-Income Tax Dep None for the respondent. **** RAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) Counsel for the appellant submi /2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued inance, Department of Revenue, limits for filing of the appeals Court and SLPs/Appeals before d the Circular No.5/2024 has bee ken with the purpose to manage l “ 2. As a step towards man decided by the Board to revise t appeals in Income-tax cases a aforementioned Circular as follows Sl. No. Appeals/SLPs in Income-t 1. Before Income

Tax Tribunal 2. Before High Court 3. Before Supreme Court

NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH ITA-85-2024(O&M) Date of Decision:29.10.2024 E TAX, PANCHKULA .…...Appellant (s) V/s.

T. LTD.

......Respondent(s) NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA NJAY VASHISTH nding Counsel, with ing Counsel, ate partment its that in terms of the Circular d by the Government of India, , Central Board of Direct Taxes, s by the department before the e the Supreme Court have been en amended and following steps itigations: nagement of litigation, it has been the monetary limits for filing of as stated in Para 4.1 of the s: tax matters Monetary Limit (Tax effect in Rs.) Appellate 60 lakh 2 crore 5 crore

) ) r , , e n s Suresh Kumar 2024.11.04 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

ITA-85-2024 (O& r in 1 5 s m 2. T issuance of SLPs/appeals and also apply and Tribunal, 3. In the case does learned couns 4. A dismissed as w 5. A accordingly.

October 29, 2 Ess Kay

Whether sp Whether r Page 2 of 2 &M)

Monetary limits given regard to filing appeal/SLP shall ncluding those relating to TDS/TC 1961 with exceptions as per paras 5/2024 dated 15.03.2024, where th shall be taken on merits, without re monetary limits.”

The modifications have come Circular i.e. 17.09.2024, an to be filed before the Supreme y to the appeals pending before which have been directed to be n view of aforesaid Circular N s not fall within the exception sel prays for withdrawal of the pr Accordingly, we allow the pray withdrawn. All pending applications also

(SANJ 2024 speaking/reasoned?

Y reportable?

Y in paragraph 2 above with l be applicable to all cases CS under the Income-tax Act, s 3.1 and 3.2 of Circular No he decision to appeal/file SLP egard to the tax effect and the into effect from the date of nd therefore shall apply to Court, High Court and Tribunal the Supreme Court, High Court withdrawn. No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024, as clause of Circular No.5/2024, resent appeal. yer as above, and the appeal is stand dismissed as withdrawn EEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No

f o l t s , s n Suresh Kumar 2024.11.04 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PANCHKULA vs. MS SYMBIOSIS PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD

What did the High Court hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments