M/S SRIDEVI DAIRY FARMS (P) LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal for the Assessment Year 2002-03. This was based on the assessee's participation in the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an ITAT order for Assessment Years 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05. The assessee later filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal for the Assessment Year 2002-03.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn due to settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
I.T.A. NO.157/2012
BETWEEN:
M/S SRIDEVI DAIRY FARMS (P) LIMITED REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI. D. NARASIMHALU NAIDU @ D.N. NAIDU,NO. 356, 24TH "B" CORSS, 9TH MAIN, II STAGE, BANASHANKARI, BANGALORE - 560070
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI A SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI BHAIRAV KUTTAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -1 (1) C.R. BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI SANMATHI E I., ADVOCATE)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 20.01.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.1093/Bang/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002-03, 2003-04 AND 2004-05, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASEED TO (i) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW STATED THEREIN. (ii) ALLOW THE
APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO.1093 TO 1095/Bang/2010 DATED 20.01.2012 REFERRED AS ANNEXURE-A.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, S.SUJATHA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ for short) against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench, Bangalore (for short ‘Tribunal’) in ITA Nos.1093 to 1095/Bang/2010 relating to the Assessment Years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo dated 26.10.2021 seeking withdrawal of the appeal relating to the Assessment Year 2002-03. The said memo reads as under: 1. “The above named appellant has filed Income Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench for the Assessment Year 2002-03.
The Appellant filed Form-1 and Form-2 for declaration and undertaking for paying taxes on disputed income under the scheme named The
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for the Assessment Year 2002-03.
Thereafter, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru-1 issued Form-3 certificate under sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 dated 02.09.2021, after verifying Form-1 and Form-2. Copy of the Form-3 is enclosed herewith for the Hon’ble Court’s reference and records.
Wherefore, in view of the above submissions the Appellant humbly prays this Hon’ble Court may pleased to permit the Appellant to withdraw the above Income Tax Appeal with liberty to revive, in case, if the dispute is not settled under the scheme the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in the interest of justice and equity.”
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the memo.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026