PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, DELHI vs. PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED
What did the High Court hold?
The Delhi High Court condoned the 21-day delay in filing the appeals after being satisfied with the reasons provided. The court then issued notice to the respondent and listed the cases for further hearing.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The Revenue sought condonation of a 21-day delay in filing these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the delay in filing the appeals by the Revenue should be condoned. The court also noted discrepancies in the ITAT's order, which would be addressed in subsequent proceedings.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~76, 77 & 79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 80/2026 & CM APPL. 6824/2026, CM APPL. 6825/2026
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, DELHI
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kr. JSC.
versus
PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr. Yash Nagar, Advocates.
77 + ITA 81/2026 & CM APPL. 6843/2026, CM APPL. 6844/2026
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, DELHI
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kr. JSC.
versus
PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr. Yash Nagar, Advocates. 79 + ITA 83/2026 & CM APPL. 6922/2026, CM APPL. 6923/2026
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-1, DELHI
.....Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC with Mr. Ashvini Kr. JSC.
versus
PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni and Mr. Yash Nagar, Advocates. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:05:23
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R %
02.02.2026 CM APPL. 6825/2026 (for delay) in ITA 80/2026 CM APPL. 6844/2026 (for delay) in ITA 81/2026 CM APPL. 6923/2026 (for delay) in ITA 83/2026 1. The instant applications have been filed seeking condonation of 21 days’ delay in filing the appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay of 21 days in filing the appeals is condoned. 3. Applications stand allowed. ITA 80/2026 & CM APPL. 6824/2026 ITA 81/2026 & CM APPL. 6843/2026 ITA 83/2026 & CM APPL. 6922/2026 4. Mr. Puneet Rai, learned Senior Standing Counsel pointed out various discrepancies in the order passed by the Tribunal. 5. Issue notice. Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the same. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to go through the certified/original copy of the order and complete instructions. 7. List these cases on 16.04.2026. DINESH MEHTA, J.
VINOD KUMAR, J. FEBRUARY 2, 2026/MR This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:05:23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026