THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FARIDABAD vs. M/S DLF UNIVERSAL LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, with the consent of both parties, disposed of the appeal as infructuous due to the settlement proceedings under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Liberty was granted to the appellant to file an application if any grievance subsists.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department filed an appeal against an ITAT order. The assessee has opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and the matter is under settlement.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the pendency of an appeal before the High Court when the assessee had opted for a settlement scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
106
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CM-7067-CII-2025 in/and
ITA-181-2022
Date of Decision: May 05, 2025
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, FARIDABAD
..... Appellant
Versus
M/S DLF UNIVERSAL LTD.
..... Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Varun Issar, Senior Standing counsel for appellant.
Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate for the applicant-respondent.
**** LISA GILL, J.
This appeal has been filed by Income Tax Department under Section 260A of Income Tax Act against order dated 24.05.2021 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, New Delhi in ITA No. 3342/Del/2016. 2.
Learned counsel for parties inform that the Assessee/respondent has approached the competent authority under “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024” and matter is in the process of settlement. CM- 7067-CII-2025 has been filed seeking disposal of this appeal which stands adjourned sine die vide order dated 19.04.2023 in view thereof.
RITU SHARMA 2025.05.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CM-7067-CII-2025 in/and ITA-181-2022
-2-
At request and with consent of learned counsel for parties, appeal is taken up for hearing today itself. 4.
In view of the averments made in application, same is allowed and present appeal is disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is afforded to appellant to file appropriate application, in case of any subsisting grievance.
(LISA GILL)
JUDGE
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) May 05, 2025
JUDGE Rts
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
RITU SHARMA 2025.05.07 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026