SRI J M VRUSHABENDRAIAH S/O MALIAPPAIAH vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the appellant sought to withdraw their appeal in light of the department's appeal being dismissed. Consequently, the court dismissed the present appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The appellant filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The respondent-department had also filed an appeal which was dismissed by a coordinate bench for failing to meet monetary limits.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the appellant's request to withdraw their appeal based on the outcome of a related appeal filed by the revenue, which was dismissed on monetary grounds.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10459-DB ITA No. 100005 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 100005 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SRI. J. M. VRUSHABENDRAIAH SON OF MALIAPPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, N. C. COLONY, NEAR STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD, HOSAPETE-583101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHASHANK S. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BELLARY, THE ASSESSING OFFICER, UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AAYKAR BHAVAN, FORT, BALLARI-583104. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. THIRUMALESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961. PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLANT TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH IN ITA NOS.299/BANG/2019 RELATING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 20.07.2022 AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10459-DB ITA No. 100005 of 2023
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV)
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo which reads as follows: “The Appellant humbly submits that being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal insofar the legal issue is concerned, the Appellant had filed the present statutory appeal. It is further submitted that the Respondent-Department too had filed a statutory appeal on merits of the matter in ITA No.100044/2023, which was dismissed by the coordinate-bench vide judgment dated 30.06.2025 on failing to meet the threshold monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT vide Circular No.09/2024 dated 17/09/2024, whilst granting liberty to revive the said appeal. It is humbly submitted that the present appeal of the Assessee too may be disposed as withdrawn in the light of the judgment of this Hon’ble court in ITA No.100044/2023 while reserving the liberty to the Appellant to revive it in the event the department’s appeal in the aforementioned ITA is revived.”
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10459-DB ITA No. 100005 of 2023
In light of the same, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE
RKM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026