COMM.OF INCOME TAX,AP -I,HYDERABAD vs. M/S.LAKSHMI BUILIDERS,HYD

Similar judgments

Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.

• M/S Comfort Living Hotels P. Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax-III
  Delhi10 Mar 2014Allowed

  Also relies on Instalment Supply (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax and 3 other authorities

  The High Court held that the ITAT did not adequately deal with the CIT(A)'s reasoning and that the expenditure merely enhanced the profit-yielding capacity without creating a new asset. The court also found that deprecia...

• Commissioner of Income Tax Del vs M/S Hi Line Pens P.Ltd
  Delhi15 Sept 2008Dismissed

  Also relies on Instalment Supply (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax and 2 other authorities

  The Tribunal correctly allowed the assessee's claim for renovation expenses as revenue expenditure under Section 30(a)(i). The distinction between 'repairs' for tenants and 'current repairs' for others was crucial, and t...

• Shervani Hospitalities Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax
  Delhi28 May 2013Allowed

  Also relies on Instalment Supply (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal was not justified in upholding the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for the disallowed amounts. The High Court held that the assessee had not concealed material facts or furnished inaccurate particulars, and ...

• M/S Asian Hotels Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax
  Delhi9 Oct 2023Partly Allowed

  Also relies on Ballimal Naval Kishore v. CIT and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal held that renovation and repair expenses, partly capitalized, were not revenue expenditure and that payments to the interior architect for consultancy were capital expenditure. However, the High Court disagr...

• Surinder Madan
  Delhi22 Aug 2013Dismissed

  Also relies on Ballimal Naval Kishore v. CIT and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal held that the expenditure on replacing the entire flooring with a new type of flooring, which provided a new and distinct advantage, was capital in nature and not 'current repairs' under Section 30(a)(ii).