THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), GURUGRAM vs. SARIKA AGGARWAL
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the application for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the appellant to file appropriate applications if the assessee violated the scheme's conditions.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and Form No. 4 was issued. The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal due to the assessee's participation in the scheme.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal should be withdrawn when the assessee has opted for a tax settlement scheme. The court also considered the liberty to file future applications regarding scheme violations.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
110-g IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CM-18351-53-CII-2025 in/and
ITA-94-2023 Date of Decision: September 15, 2025
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), GURGAON
….. Appellant
Versus
SARIKA AGGARWAL
..... Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Sonia Bohat, Advocate for Mr. Sukesh Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the respondent.
**** LISA GILL, J. CM-18351-CII-2025
This application seeking preponement of hearing of appeal is rendered infructuous. 2.
Application is disposed of accordingly. CM-18352-53-CII-2025 in/and ITA-94-2023 1.
Learned counsel for appellant submits that respondent – Assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and in pursuance thereof Form No. 4 has since been issued.
RITU SHARMA 2025.09.18 12:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CM-18351-53-CII-2025 in/and ITA-94-2023
-2-
In view thereof, appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal with questions of law being kept open for adjudication in appropriate proceedings. He also seeks liberty to file appropriate application in case, it is found that respondent – Assessee has furnished incorrect declaration or has violated any conditions of the Scheme. 3.
Learned counsel for respondent verifies that Assessee has opted for the Scheme in question. 4.
Application is allowed and appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. 5.
Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(LISA GILL)
JUDGE
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) September 15, 2025
JUDGE Rts
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2025.09.18 12:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026