DR.R.P.PATEL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The assessee, through their counsel, informed the court that they do not wish to press the appeal and petitions. They sought permission to withdraw them.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Dr. R.P. Patel, filed an Income Tax Appeal and a Writ Petition before the High Court of Kerala. The assessee was represented by their counsel.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee would proceed with the appeal and writ petitions filed before the High Court.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 23RD POUSHA, 1944 I.T.A. NO.270 OF 2015 (AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 936/2008 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH) APPELLANT:
DR.R.P.PATEL, HAHNEMANN HOUSE, COLLEGE ROAD, KOTTAYAM (PRESENTLY RESIDING AT HAHNEMANN HOUSE- MEISSEN, ATMA JYOTI ASHRAM ROAD, SUBHANPURA.P.O., VADODARA, GUJARAT)
BY ADV SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN RESPONDENT:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SASTHRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686 001.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.R.MENON, SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS I.T.A. HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.01.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).35338/2005, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
I.T.A. No.270/2015 & WPC No.35338/2005 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 23RD POUSHA, 1944 W.P.(C) NO.35338 OF 2005 PETITIONER:
DR. R.P.PATEL, HAHNEMANN HOUSE, COLLEGE ROAD, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV SRI.RAMESH CHERIAN JOHN RESPONDENT:
ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-I, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.01.2023, ALONG WITH ITA.270/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
I.T.A. No.270/2015 & WPC No.35338/2005 3
JUDGMENT (Dated: 13th January, 2023)
S.V.Bhatti, J.
Heard Adv.Ramesh Cherian John. Having regard to the instructions received from the assessee, the appellant does not press the appeal and seeks the liberty of the court to withdraw the appeal and writ petitions. Income tax appeal and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI, JUDGE
Sd/- BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE ss
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026