PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX GURGAON vs. M/S INDO GLOBAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The court kept the question of law open for adjudication in appropriate proceedings, as per instructions from the appellant's counsel.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act challenging an ITAT order. The tax effect involved in the appeal was under Rs. 2 Crores.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the appellant's decision to withdraw the appeal due to the low tax effect, as per a government circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No. 308 of 2015 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 308 of 2015 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 14.01.2026
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Gurgaon
..... Appellant
Versus
M/s Indo Global Education Foundation
..... Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI
Present: Mr. Varun Issar, Sr. Standing Counsel
for the appellant.
Ms. Parnika Singla, Advocate
for respondent.
**** LISA GILL, J.
Present appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, challenging order dated 22.01.2015 passed by learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench ‘B’, in ITA No. 226/Chd/2013. 2.
Learned counsel for appellant on instructions submits that as the tax effect involved in this appeal is under Rs.2 Crores, he has specific instructions to withdraw this appeal in view of circular No. 9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024 issued by Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, CBDT, Government of India. However, question of law as arising in appeal be kept open for adjudication in appropriate proceedings. SANJAY KHAN 2026.01.16 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
ITA No. 308 of 2015 (O&M)
-2- 3.
Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with question of law being kept open for adjudication in appropriate proceedings.
Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
(LISA GILL)
JUDGE
(RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) 14.01.2026
JUDGE s.khan
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJAY KHAN 2026.01.16 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026