Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENGALURU IN ITA
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:35616-DB ITA No. 261 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.261 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C R BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE NO.55/1, SHILPASHREE VIDHYARANYA COMPLEX VISHVESHWARANGAR MYSURU - 570 008. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S SREE SHIVALINGESHWARA ARECANUT TRADERS 21, L BLOCK, APMC YARD SHIVAMOGGA - 577 204 PAN. AALFS 3372E …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G S NAGHARISH, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2024:KHC:35616-DB ITA No. 261 of 2022
THE INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07/12/2021 PASSED IN ITA NO. 142/BANG/2021, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016 PRAYING TO I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO. 142/BANG/2021 DATED 07/12/2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016 ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MYSURU.III. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
- 3 -
NC: 2024:KHC:35616-DB ITA No. 261 of 2022
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
This appeal is filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Ac t') questioning the correctness or otherwise of order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru in ITA No.142/Bang/2021 dated 07.12.2021 for the Assessment Year 2015-16 (Annexure-C).
The appeal was admitted on 06.09.2022 to examine the questions of law raised by the appellants which are extracted below:
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal order can be said as perverse in nature in holding that the conditions prescribed for passing order under section 263 of the Act are not satisfied when the CIT has given elaborate findings to demonstrate that the order passed by assessing authority was prejudicial as well as erroneous order"?
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in allowing appeal preferred by assessee by setting aside order passed under section 263 of the Act ignoring that assessing authority had not derived gross profits from unaccounted sales and purchases recorded in seized documents and
- 4 -
NC: 2024:KHC:35616-DB ITA No. 261 of 2022
assessing authority further failed to make proper enquiry before making additions"?
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal's order setting aside order passed under section 263 of the Act holding that the assessing authority was correct in determining the unaccented income on the basis of GP rate in disclosed transactions as per regular books of accounts ignoring findings of Commissioner of Income Tax"?.
This appeal was filed on 23.05.2022 and Monetary value involved is Rs.64,67,618/-. Subsequent to filing of the appeal, Circular bearing No.5/2024 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007- ITJ(PT.)] dated 15.3.2024 is issued under Section 265(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 prescribing monetary limit and the exceptions to prefer an appeal before the High Court.
In view of the above Circular, the above appeal would not be maintainable since monetary value involved in this appeal is less than rupees one crore. Therefore, the above appeal would not survive for consideration and the same is dismissed.
- 5 -
NC: 2024:KHC:35616-DB ITA No. 261 of 2022
In view of the above, the substantial questions of law raised in the appeal are kept open to be considered in an appropriate case.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5