DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. NEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V.
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that the expenditure incurred on repairs and maintenance of a factory building, which was not for the purpose of earning income but for maintaining the existing asset, was revenue in nature. Therefore, it was allowable as a deduction.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction for expenses incurred on account of repairs and maintenance of its factory building. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, treating it as a capital expenditure. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether expenditure on repairs and maintenance of a factory building is revenue or capital in nature. Whether such expenditure is allowable as a deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
2011:DHC:11958-DB
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026