DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. NEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V.
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that the expenditure incurred on repairs and maintenance of the factory building was revenue in nature and therefore deductible. It reasoned that the expenditure was for maintaining the existing asset and not for its improvement or acquisition.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction for expenses incurred on account of repairs and maintenance of its factory building. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, treating it as a capital expenditure. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether expenditure on repairs and maintenance of a factory building is revenue or capital expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
2011:DHC:11990-DB
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026