DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. NEW SKIES SATELLITE N.V.
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that the expenses incurred on foreign travel and business development were revenue in nature and not capital expenditure. The Tribunal reasoned that these expenses were incurred for the purpose of earning income and not for acquiring an enduring benefit.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction for expenses incurred on foreign travel and business development. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses, treating them as capital expenditure. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses incurred on foreign travel and business development are revenue or capital expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
2011:DHC:11984-DB
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026