DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX vs. NEW SKIES SATELLITE B.V.
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that the expenses incurred for foreign travel for business promotion and for acquiring technical know-how were revenue in nature. Therefore, they were allowable as deductions.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction for expenses incurred on foreign travel and business promotion. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses, treating them as capital expenditure. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses incurred on foreign travel for business promotion and acquiring technical know-how are revenue or capital expenditure.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
2011:DHC:11970-DB
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026