RAJAN NANDA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 1428 / 2008HC Delhi16 December 201153 pages
For Petitioner: R.M.MEHTA
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The Tribunal held that the expenses incurred were for the purpose of business and were revenue in nature. Therefore, they were allowable as deductions.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed certain expenses as deductible. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses, treating them as capital expenditure. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the disallowance.

What were the issues?

Whether the expenses incurred by the assessee were revenue or capital in nature.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 37

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

2011:DHC:11937-DB

More judgments on Section 37

All 4,334 judgments and leading authorities on Section 37 →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →