COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTRE,THENI vs. ITO WARD 1(1), THENI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the AO had not considered the implications of the restored Section 12A registration, the appeals should be restored to the AO for re-adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, originally registered under Section 12A, had its registration withdrawn. This withdrawal was later restored by the Tribunal and upheld by the High Court. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) did not grant the benefit of this registration during assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the Assessing Officer correctly considered the benefit of Section 12A registration which was restored by the Tribunal and upheld by the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
आदेश /O R D E R
PER GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: & 1375/Chny/2018 are the appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Madurai in ITA No.0022/2013-14 dated 15.03.2018 and ITA No.0224/2014-15 dated 15.03.2018 for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively.
Shri G. Baskar, Advocate, represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Addl.CIT, represented on behalf of the Revenue.
As the issues in these appeals are identical, the appeals are disposed of by this common order.
It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that the assessee was originally enjoying the benefit of registration under Section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). It was submitted that subsequently the Ld. CIT had withdrawn the registration granted under Section 12A of the Act by invoking provisions of Section 12AA(3) of the Act vide order dated 06.12.2010. It was a submission that the same was under challenge in appeals and the Tribunal vide order dated 23rd September, 2013 in I.T.A.
Nos.2207 & 1998(Mds)/2010 had restored the benefit of registration under Section 12A and Section 80G of the Act. It was a submission that the order of the Tribunal was the subject matter of appeals by the Revenue before Hon'ble High Court of Madras in Tax Case Appeal Nos.370 & 371 of 2014 which were dismissed by an order dated 29.01.2016 on account of tax effect. It was a submission that the A.O. while passing the assessment order for assessment year 2010-11 did not have the benefit of the order of this Tribunal granting the assessee the benefit of registration under Section 12A of the Act and for the assessment year 2011-12, the A.O. though had the benefit of the order of this Tribunal, had taken the stand that the Revenue was in appeal before the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court and consequently had not granted the benefit of registration under Section 12A of the Act. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that he had no objection if the issue was restored to the file of A.O. for re-adjudication after considering the benefit of registration under Section 12A of the Act as granted by this Tribunal.
In reply, the Ld. D.R. submitted that the directions given by the Tribunal in its order while granting registration under Section 12A of the Act was liable to be considered. He vehemently supported the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals) and order of the A.O.
We have considered the rival submissions. Admittedly, the issue of registration under Section 12A of the Act now stands restored in view of the decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case which has also been upheld by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court on account of withdrawal of appeal by the Revenue on account of tax effect. This being so, as the A.O. has not considered the ramification of the directions of the Tribunal in its order granting the assessee the benefit of Section 12A of the Act, the issues in these appeals are restored to the file of the A.O. for re-adjudication after considering the order of this Tribunal granting the assessee the benefit of registration under Section 12A of the Act.
In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026