ACIT CIRCLE 1, NAMAKKAL vs. K.M.RAMASAMY, NAMAKKAL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1895/CHNY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 November 2018AY 2013-142 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal noted that the tax effect was less than ₹20,00,000/-. Following CBDT Circular No.3/2018, appeals below this limit are to be withdrawn or not pressed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal against an order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The assessee did not appear before the tribunal. The tax effect in the appeal was below the specified limit.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT circular.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH : CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY]

आदेश / O R D E R

PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

1.

This appeal of the Revenue is directed against an order dated 13.03.2018 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Salem.

2.

Ld. Departmental Representative fairly agreed that the tax effect was less than �20,00,000/- and by virtue of para 13 of CBDT

ITA No.1895 /2018 :- 2 -:

Circular No.3/2018, dated 11.07.2018, pending appeals below the specified tax limit had to be withdrawn/not pressed.

3.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee.

4.

We have considered the submission of the ld. Departmental Representative. Since the tax effect in this appeal is less than �20,00,000/-, appeal of the Revenue cannot survive.

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed . 5. Order pronounced on Tuesday, the 20th day of November, 2018, at Chennai.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →