GANAN MERCANTILE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 6(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found it appropriate to remand the matter to the AO for fresh verification of the details of share subscribing companies, allowing the assessee to cooperate and provide evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns the confirmation of share capital raised, where the AO added Rs. 3 crore as cash credit under Section 68. The assessee remained absent before the CIT(A) and now seeks to remand the matter for fresh verification of share subscribing companies.
What were the issues?
The primary issue is the validity of share capital raised and the AO's addition as cash credit due to non-compliance. The assessee also sought an opportunity to furnish details of share subscribing companies.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “A”, KOLKATA
ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 23.01.2018 passed by CIT(A)-7, Kolkata for AY 2012-13 u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”).
Heard both parties and perused material available on record. The substantial issue raised in this appeal is relating to confirmation of share capital raised by the assessee and for non-compliance of notices/summons by the directors, Principal officer of the assessee and shareholder companies, the AO added an amount of Rs.3 crore on account of cash credit u/s 68 of the Act. It is noted from the record that the assessee remained absent before the First Appellate Authority. Now, the contention of the Ld.AR is that the issue is involving the share capital raised from shareholders, there was no opportunity for the assessee to furnish details of share subscribing companies prayed to remand the matter to the file of AO for his fresh verification in respect of details of shares subscribing companies. Further, he submitted that the assessee is ready to co-operate
(ASSESSMENT YEAR-2012-13) and provide all the details in respect of share capital amount. Ld.DR did not report objection. Ld.DR submits that all the share subscribing companies having no business activities and argued no purpose will be served, if it is sent to AO for his verification. Taking into consideration the submissions of Ld.AR & Ld. DR and facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the AO for his fresh verification in respect of details of share subscribing companies. The assessee shall co-operate in the proceedings. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of his contention. Thus, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13.02.2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (P.M.JAGTAP) (S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Date:- 13 .02.2019 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to:
1. 1. Appellant- Ganan Mercantile Pvt.Ltd., Co-Subash Agarwal & Associates, Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, 2nd Floor, Suite-213, Kolkata-700069.
2. Respondent- ITO, Ward-6(2), Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069.
3. CIT-Kolkata 4. CIT(Appeals)-Kolkata 5. DR: ITAT -Kolkata Benches By order
AR/H.O.O ITAT, KOLKATA
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026