ITO, WARD - 40(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SRI KALIDAS SAHA, NORTH 24 PARGANAS
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
Following CBDT Circular No.3/2018, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal as withdrawn. The circular mandates withdrawal of appeals with a tax effect below a certain limit.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2013-14. The tax effect in the appeal did not exceed the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No.3/2018.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn based on the CBDT's monetary limit for appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “B”, KOLKATA
ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal filed by the Revenue against the order dated 31.07.2017 passed by CIT(A)-12, Kolkata for AY 2013-14. 2. In the relevant appeal, the undisputed fact is that the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20,00,000/-, fixed by the CBDT Circular No.3/2018, F.No.0279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt), dated 11th July, 2018. 3. As mandated by this above referred Circular No.3/2018, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13.02.2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026