Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Before: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned CIT(A), 17, New Delhi dated 20.11.2015 passed for the assessment year 2011-12.
None is present on behalf of the assessee despite the notice for hearing was sent through registered post at the address given in the appeal papers, which returned back by the postal authorities with the remark “left”. No other address is made available on record nor is there any written request for adjournment on behalf of the assessee. It appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee deserves to be dismissed in limine for want of prosecution in view of the orders of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
In the result, the appeal is dismissed, as indicated above.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 09.11.2017.