Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Before: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned CIT(A), 32, New Delhi dated 10.10.2015 passed for the assessment year 2007-08.
None is present on behalf of the assessee despite the notice for hearing was sent through registered post at the address given in the appeal papers.
There is no written request on record for adjournment on behalf of the assessee. It, therefore, appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee deserves to be dismissed in limine for want of prosecution in view of the orders of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
In the result, the appeal is dismissed, as indicated above.