A.C.I.T. - 27(3), MUMBAI vs. SYNDICATE ENGG. INDUSTRIES, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the revenue was covered by the low tax effect circular. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed based on the monetary limit for appeals before the Tribunal.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal against the relief granted to the assessee by the first appellate authority. The tax effect of the disputed additions was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 03/2018.
What were the issues?
Whether the revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal given the low tax effect of the disputed additions, as per CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JM & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश / O R D E R
Per Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year [AY] 2009-10 contests the order of Ld. first appellate authority qua certain relief provided to the assessee. None has appeared for assessee. Therefore, left with no option, we proceed to dispose-off the same on the basis of
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- V3 Enterprises PVT LTD vs. The State Of ApAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- Zenith Metaplast(P) Limited vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- M/S Karo Sambhav Private Limited Through Its Director Mr. Pranshu Singhal vs. Additional/Joint Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 31 Oct 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026