ACIT, CC - 4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. BHADRESWAR RICE MILL, BURDWAN
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the disallowance, following the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT vs Vijay Shree Ltd. The appeal was also dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 70,190/- for belated payment of employees' PF contribution. The assessee paid the contribution before the due date of filing the return of income. The CIT(A) deleted this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether belated payment of employees' PF contribution, made before the due date of filing the return of income, is allowable as a deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH (D
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, JM]
order
: March 06, 2019 ORDER
Per P.M. Jagtap, Vice President
This appeal is preferred by the revenue against the order of Ld. CIT(A) – 21, Kolkata dated 28.05.2018 and the solitary issue involved therein relates to the deletion by the Ld. CIT(A) of the disallowance of Rs. 70,190/- made by the AO on account of belated payment of employees contribution to provident fund after the due dates as prescribed in the Provident Fund Act but before the due date of filing the return of income for the year under consideration.
At the time of hearing fixed in this case today, none has appeared on behalf of the assessee respondent. The learned DR has fairly and frankly admitted that the solitary issue involved in this appeal of the assessee is squarely covered in favour of the assessee inter alia by the decision of Hon’ble Kolkata High Court in the case of Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. Bhadreswar Rice Mill CIT vs Vijay Shree Ltd. ITAT No. 245 of 2011, G.A. No. 2607 of 2011, Judgement dated 6th September, 2011 and the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) giving relief to the assessee on this issue deserves to be upheld by following the said decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court. It is also observed that the tax effect involved in this appeal of the revenue is less than the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs prescribed by the CBDT for filing the appeal of the department before the Tribunal as per Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 and this appeal of the revenue is liable to be dismissed even on the ground of low tax effect.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue are dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 6th March, 2019.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- V3 Enterprises PVT LTD vs. The State Of ApAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- Zenith Metaplast(P) Limited vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 1 Nov 2026
- M/S Karo Sambhav Private Limited Through Its Director Mr. Pranshu Singhal vs. Additional/Joint Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 31 Oct 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026