SANJIBON DIAGONOSTIC & MEDICAL RESEARCH PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the expenses were not fully supported by third-party vouchers, a complete disallowance was not justified. The disallowance was restricted to 10% of the expenditure to meet the interests of justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a diagnostic centre, filed its return of income for AY 2004-05 declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer made an adhoc disallowance of 20% of travelling and conveyance expenses, which was confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the adhoc disallowance of travelling and conveyance expenses due to lack of third-party vouchers and the extent of disallowance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi]
order
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026