ESSAR POWER LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 6(3)(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal directed to delete ITA No.1931/Mum/2016 from the previous order as it was incorrectly included and not part of the proceedings.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum order to rectify a typographical mistake in a previous order dated 03/07/2018. The previous order mistakenly mentioned ITA No.1931/Mum/2016, which was not heard by the tribunal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correction of a procedural error in a prior tribunal order due to a typographical mistake.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “K”, BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
CORRIGENDUM O R D E R
This corrigendum order is passed to rectify a typographical mistake in order dated 03/07/2018. In the cause title was wrongly mentioned in the order dated 03/07/2018. As ITA No.1931/Mum/2016 was not taken up for hearing, we direct to delete ITA No.1931/Mum/2016.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026