Loading judgment…
Facts
The Revenue filed appeals and the Assessee filed cross-objections challenging CIT(A) orders for A.Y. 2013-14 & 2016-17 under Section 153A. The Assessee's counsel argued that the tax effect in the Revenue's appeals was below the Rs. 60,00,000/- monetary limit set by CBDT Circular No. 05/2024, rendering them unmaintainable, a fact accepted by the Departmental Representative.
Held
The Tribunal confirmed that the tax effect on the disputed amount was below the Rs. 60,00,000/- monetary limit stipulated by CBDT Circular No. 05/2024. Accordingly, the Revenue's appeals were dismissed, with liberty to revive them if covered by any exceptions, and the Assessee's cross-objections were dismissed as infructuous.
Key Issues
Maintainability of revenue's appeals due to low tax effect as per CBDT Circular.
Sections Cited
153A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH, DELHI
Before: MS. MADHUMIT ROY & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
The present appeals filed by the revenue and cross objection filed by the assessee are directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-30, arising out of the Assessment Order for A.Y. 2013-14 & 2016-17 u/s 153A of the Act.
At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the tax effect on the amount disputed by the Revenue in the present appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.60,00,000/-. Hence, appeal is not maintainable.
Learned Departmental Representative fairly accepted the aforesaid factual position. However, he submitted, liberty may be granted to Revenue to revive the appeal, in case, subsequently it is found that the tax effect on the amount disputed is more than Rs. 60,00,000/- or the appeal is covered by any of the exceptions provided to the tax effect circular.
We have considered the rival submissions and perused the materials on record. After perusing the respective orders of the departmental authorities and the facts mentioned in the memorandum of appeal filed in Form No. 36, we find that the tax effect on the amount disputed by the Revenue in the present appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.60,00,000/- fixed in CBDT Circular no. 05/2024 dated 15.03.2024 for filing an appeal before the Tribunal. There is nothing on record to suggest that the appeal of Revenue is protected by any of the exceptions to the aforesaid circular. Thus, in our view, the present appeal is covered under CBDT Circular no. 05/2024 dated 15.03.2024.
C.O. No. 142/Del/2022 DCIT, CC-31 Vs. M/s SRC Realtech Pvt. Ltd. Accordingly, the appeal is deemed to have been withdrawn, hence, dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the Revenue to seek revival of the appeal is protected under any of the exceptions provided to the Circular noted above.
In view of the appeals being dismissed due to low tax effect the Cross Objections in respect of the same appeals is found to be erroneous and hence, dismissed as infructous.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 25.11.2024