M/S. MOHAN JUTE BAGS MFG. CO.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 35(4), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2169/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata30 April 2019AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. This was done to provide the assessee an opportunity of being heard, adhering to principles of natural justice, subject to payment of costs.

What were the facts?

The assessee did not appear before the CIT(A), resulting in an ex-parte order. The CIT(A) rejected the petition for condonation of delay and did not decide the case on merits. The assessee was not heard.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in passing an ex-parte order without hearing the assessee and rejecting the condonation of delay petition. Whether principles of natural justice were violated.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy

order

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →