M/S. BABA BHOOTNATH TRADE & COMMERCE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD - 9(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to delete paragraphs 5.1 and 6 from the original order as they contained typographical errors and were not pertinent to the assessee's appeal. This corrigendum forms part of the original order.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to an earlier order dated 05.04.2019 in ITA No.1494/Kol/2017 for the assessment year 2012-13. The corrigendum clarifies that two paragraphs (5.1 and 6) in the original order were typographical errors and not relevant to the assessee's case.
What were the issues?
The primary issue addressed by this corrigendum is the correction of factual errors in a previous tribunal order to ensure accuracy and relevance to the specific case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Sri Aby. T. Varkey & Shri M. Balaganesh, AM]
order passed by this Tribunal dated 05.04.2019 vide are typographical error and not pertaining to the assessee/appellant’s case. Therefore, these two Paragraph Nos.5.1 & 6 are hereby deleted by this Tribunal.
This corrigendum will form part of the earlier order dated 05.04.2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026