JAYASRI BENERJEE,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-25(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 955/KOL/2016Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata17 May 2019AY 2006-072 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(A) to decide the grounds challenging the validity of reopening and other substantive grounds. The CIT(A) was directed to decide the appeal afresh on all issues.

What were the facts?

The assessee challenged the reopening of assessment and subsequent additions for AY 2006-07. The additions pertained to unexplained cash credits, disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), and TDS mismatch.

What were the issues?

The key issues were the validity of reopening the assessment and the assessee's alleged concession before the lower appellate authority regarding the grounds of appeal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148,Section 147,Section 40(a)(ia)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “C” KOLKATA

Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini

O R D E R

PER S.S.Godara, Judicial Member:

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →