SH. AVINASH SINGLA,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1, LUDHIANA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that considering the declaration of Rs. 10 lacs in the group company to cover irregularities, family savings, and the gift, the source of cash was established. It is difficult to precisely quantify family cash holdings.
What were the facts?
During a search operation, Rs. 10,72,500/- in cash was found at the assessee's residence. The assessee explained the source as Rs. 4 lacs from his son's company, family savings, and a Rs. 7 lacs gift from his brother. The AO accepted Rs. 4 lacs but added the remaining Rs. 6 lacs.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of Rs. 6 lacs on account of unexplained cash found during a search is justified when the assessee provided explanations and supporting evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short ‘the CIT (A)’] dated 17.06.2022 passed for assessment year 2019-20. Though the assessee has taken five grounds of appeal but his solitary grievance is that ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs.6 lacs which was A.Y.2019-20 2 added by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained cash found at the residential premises during the course of search.
The brief facts of the case are that a search & seizure operation under Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act was carried out on 25.04.2018 at the residential premises of the assessee alongwith various business premises of the group.
The AO has issued notice and a return of income was filed on 31.12.2019 declaring total income of Rs.7,38,280/-.
According to the AO, this return was filed under Section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act. The AO has issued notice under Section 143(2) on 07.02.2020. On scrutiny of the accounts it revealed that a cash of Rs.10,72,500/- was found at the residential premises of Shri Avinash Singla at the time of search. This factum was put to Shri Avinash Singla during the course of search vide Question No. 12-13 while recording his statement under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act.
The Question No. 12 exhibits that how much cash is lying within his residential premises. In reply to it, it was submitted by the assessee that approximately Rs. 10.50 lacs A.Y.2019-20 3 is available. Similarly, when it was put to the assessee that whether this cash belongs to somebody else, then assessee has replied that this cash related to him, his business concern and may be of family members but exact break-up cannot be given at present. During the course of assessment proceedings, AO confronted the assessee to explain source of this cash. The assessee has submitted that Rs. Four Lacs was brought at home by his son Shri Nitish Singla who is the Director, Avinash Agro Pvt. Ltd. and rest of the amount is savings of the family as well as Rs.7 lacs received by him as a gift from his brother. He has filed documentary evidence in respect of this plea. The ld. AO has accepted the availability of Rs.4 lacs from M/s Avinash Agro Pvt. Ltd. but did not accept balance explanation and made the addition of Rs.6 lacs.
Appeal to the CIT(A) did not bring any relief to the assessee.
With the assistance of ld. Representative, we have gone through the record carefully. It is pertinent to note that during the course of search, assessee in the capacity of one
ITA No.597/CHD/2022 A.Y.2019-20 4 of the Director has declared a sum of Rs.10 lacs in M/s Avinash Agro Pvt. Ltd. to cover up any irregularity in explanation of any unexplained item. This Rs.10 lacs has been assessed in the hands of M/s Avinash Agro Pvt. Ltd. which was framed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has drew our attention to page No. 47 to 50 of the Paper Book where this factum is available in the assessment order. He has also referred to page No. 38 to 46, ITR-V and Computation of Income in the case of M/s Avinash Agro Pvt. Ltd. and these documents, it has been disclosed that assessee has declared additional income of Rs.10 lacs. Therefore, we are of the view that if explanation is taken into consideration, based on cumulative circumstances, namely; (1) Rs.10 lacs was declared to cover up such type of issues in the case of M/s Avinash Agro Pvt. Ltd.; (b) Past savings of the family members, and (c) Gift received from the brothers, then it would be established that source of cash is available with the assessee. It is difficult to establish a cash available in the family with a mathematic precision. It is to be appreciated on the normal human behaviour available in the A.Y.2019-20 5 family and if all the family members are assessable to tax, then possibility of their savings and availability of Rs.10 lacs could never be denied. Therefore, learned Revenue Officers have erred in not appreciating the facts and circumstances in right perspective and confirming the addition of Rs.6 lacs.
We allow this appeal and delete the addition of Rs.6 lacs.
In result, appeal is allowed.
Order pronounced on 08.01.2025.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026