DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. SONA VETS PVT. LTD., KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A)'s order was consequential to a Section 263 direction that had been quashed by the ITAT. Therefore, the consequential order became non-est and infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order passed by the CIT(A) which was consequential to a direction under Section 263. The assessee argued that the original Section 263 order by the CIT was quashed by the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether a consequential order passed in pursuance of a Section 263 direction is valid if the original Section 263 order is quashed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
DCIT, Central Circle-2(1), Kolkata Appellant Vs M/s Sona Vets Pvt. Ltd. Respondent [PAN:AAECS0908G] For the Appellant : Shri Radhey Shyam, CIT For the Respondent : Shri A. K. Tulsiyan, FCA Date of hearing : 13.08.2019 Date of pronouncement : 04.10.2019 ORDER PER Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, JM:
This appeal by the Revenue against the order dated 02.04.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, Kolkata [‘CIT(A)’] for Assessment Year 2010-11.
Heard both parties and persued the material available on record. The order impugned before us is against the consequential order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3)/153A/263/250 of the Act in pursuance of the directions of CIT(A) u/s 263 of the Act. The ld. AR brought to our notice the order passed by the CIT(A) u/s 263 of the Act has been quashed by this Tribunal vide its order dated 17.10.2017 and placed on record the same and referred to Para No.6 of this order and argued that when the directions given by the CIT u/s 263 are no more in existence and the consequential order passed thereon becomes non-est. It is noted that the CIT in the first appellate proceedings taking into consideration the order passed by M/s Sona Vets Pvt. Ltd. the ITAT in dismissed the consequential order passed by the Assessing Officer. Therefore, in our opinion, the order impugned before us becomes infractuous and no orders are required. Therefore the grounds raised
by the Revenue in this Appeal become infractuous and consequently these are dismissed.
3. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 04.10.2019.
Sd/- Sd/- [J. Sudhakar Reddy] [S.S. Viswanethra Ravi] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated : 04.10.2019 Place : Kolkata RS, Sr.PS Copy of the order forwarded to:
1. 1. Appellant – DCIT, Central Circle-2(1), Kolkata. 2 Respondent– M/s Sona Vets Pvt. Ltd., 17B &C, Everest House, 46C, Chowringhee Road, Kol-71.
3. The CIT(A), Kolkata 4. CIT , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026