M/S. METAFEB BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 14(3), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 51/KOL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata31 October 2019AY 2013-142 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had passed an ex-parte order without adjudicating on merits, which is not in accordance with law. Therefore, the case was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal with a 7-day delay, which was condoned. However, the assessee did not appear for the hearing before the ITAT, and the Departmental Representative was heard ex-parte.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) order was passed in accordance with law when it dismissed the appeal ex-parte without considering the merits, violating principles of natural justice.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH: KOLKATA

Hearing: 31.10.2019Pronounced: 31.10.2019

ORDER

Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM

1.

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A) – 5, Kolkata dated 04.10.2018 for AY 2013-14.

2.

At the outset we find that there is a delay of 7 days in filing of this appeal. After perusing the petition for condonation, we are convinced that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal on time. Hence, the delay is condoned and the appeal is admitted.

3.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing before us. There is no application for adjournment either. Under these circumstances, we dispose off the case ex- parte on merits qua the assessee after hearing the ld. Departmental Representative. 4. At the outset, after perusing the order passed by the ld. CIT(A), we find that the assessee has not appeared before the ld. CIT(A) and hence an ex-parte order was passed dismissing the appeal of the assessee. We note that the ld. CIT(A) has not disposed off the case on merits and passed a cryptic order. This is not in accordance with law. Hence, we deem it fit to restore the issue to the file of the ld. CIT(A), for fresh adjudication, in M/s. Metafeb Builders & Contractors Pvt. Ltd., AY 2013-14 accordance with law, after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard, on the grounds of natural justice. 5. In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd/- (J. Sudhakar Reddy) (A. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 31st October, 2019 Jd.(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to: 1)Appellant – M/s. Metafeb Builders & Contractors Pvt. Ltd., 16B, Madan Chatterjee Lane, Kolkata-700 007.

2) Respondent –ITO, Ward-14(3), Kolkata. 3) CIT(A)-5, Kolkata. (sent through e-mail) 4)CIT , Kolkata 5)DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →