MEHTA BROTHERS GEMS PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ACIT(5)(2)(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted permission for the withdrawal of the appeals, following the precedent set by the Madras High Court. The assessee was given liberty to seek restoration if the scheme's benefits were not realized.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020, and received a declaration order. The appeals were pending before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश / O R D E R भहावीय स िंह, उऩाध्मक्ष के द्वाया / PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VP: These appeals of assessee are arising out of the common order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)]-10, Mumbai, [in short CIT(A)], in dated
At the outset, it is noticed that the assessee has opted for ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’ by filing the application form Nos. 1 and 2 with the Department. From the records, it is noticed that the assessee has also received declaration order in From No. 3 vide acknowledgement Nos. i.e. 275418290260221 for AY 2008-09 and 273335470240221 for AY 2012-13. These appeals were filed before ITAT on 14.08.2019 and the appeals are pending for disposal. The appeals are pending and assessee is eligible for the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’. The assessee has requested for withdrawal of these appeals and seeks permission for the same vide letter dated nil.
After hearing the Ld. Sr. DR and perusing the records, it is noticed that the assessee is opting for ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’ by filing form Nos. 1 and 2 and department also issued form No. 3 in both the years. In view of the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Nannusamy Mohan (HUF) vs. ACIT in I.C.A. No.372 of 2020 dated 16.10.2020, wherein Hon'ble High Court after considering the intent of the assessee to avail the benefit of ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’ has dismissed the appeal by observing in Para 7 to 9 as under: -
In the light of the above, we direct the appellant/ assessee to file the Form No.I on or before 20.11.2020 and the competent authority shall process the application/ declaration in accordance with the Act and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 (6) weeks from the date on which the declaration is filed in the proper form.
With this declaration, the Tax Case appeal stands disposed of with the aforementioned liberty and Consequently the Substantial Question of Law are left upon. No costs.”
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026