Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “SMC” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI
Date of Hearing : 09.07.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 09.07.2018 ORDER
This appeal by assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A), Aligadh, dated 30.10.2017, for the A.Y. 2009-2010.
The assessee has been notified the date of hearing through registered post. However, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. It, therefore, appears that assessee is no more
2 ITA.No.45/Del./2018 Shri Ashok Kumar, Bulandshahr, U.P. interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal of assessee is liable to be dismissed as un-admitted.
In view of the above and having regard to Rule 19(2) of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.); Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court decision in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), and also the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) wherein their Lordships held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the same, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as un-admitted.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
3 ITA.No.45/Del./2018 Shri Ashok Kumar, Bulandshahr, U.P. Order pronounced in the open Court.