MANGLAM INFRA,MOHALI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1), CHANDIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal, which was unopposed by the Departmental Representative. Considering the circumstances, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax dated 17.03.2025. Subsequently, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal, informing the Tribunal that the Assessing Officer had already passed a fresh assessment order under section 143(3) read with 263, accepting the declared income.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be permitted to be withdrawn when a subsequent assessment order has been passed accepting the assessee's declared income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH BENCH, ‘B’, CHANDIGARH
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
Order Per Krinwant Sahay, AM: Appeal in this case has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 17.03.2025 passed by Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh-1.
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted an application dt. 8.3.2026 requesting for withdrawal of the appeal stating as under: -
499-Chd-2025 2 “The above said appeal is against the order u/s 263 of the Ld. CIT. In this regard, it is submitted that the Ld. AO has made the assessment in view the of the order u/s 263 of Ld. CIT. The Ld. AO has made the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 vide order dated 07.01.2026, in which the income declared by the assessee has been accepted. Keeping in view the same the present appeal against the order u/s 263 is hereby withdrawn. The copy of assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 dated 07.01.2026 is enclosed herewith”.
In view of the above, the Ld. Counsel prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.
4. The ld. DR did not object for withdrawal.
We have considered the submissions of Ld. Representatives. Considering the prayer of the assessee, this appeal is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 10.03.2026.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026