Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Before: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu
Date of Hearing 19.07.2018 Date of Pronouncement 19.07.2018 ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: The assessee is in captioned appeal before the Tribunal, challenging the order of ld. CIT(A)-29, New Delhi dated 18.03.2016 for the assessment year 2010-11.
None is present on behalf of the assessee. Notice for hearing was sent to the assessee through registered post at the address given in the appeal papers, which is deemed to have been served upon it, as the same has not returned back un-served. No any written request for adjournment on behalf of the assessee has come before us. It, therefore, appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its appeal. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee deserves to be dismissed in limine for want of prosecution in view of the orders of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
Before parting, we think it appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing, then it may, if so advised, pray for recall of this order and decision on merits.
In the result, all the appeals are dismissed, as indicated above. Order is pronounced in the open court on 19th July, 2018.