DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(1), CHENNAI vs. TAMIL NADU MEDICINAL PLANT FARMS AND HERBAL MEDICINES CORPORATION LIMITED, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect in these cases was less than ₹50 lakhs. Following a CBDT circular, the Tribunal held that the Revenue could not proceed with such appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT, and in some cases, assessees filed cross-objections. The appeals were heard together.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals with a tax effect below the revised monetary limit set by CBDT are maintainable before the ITAT.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
Heard together (19 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश /O R D E R
PER BENCH:
These appeals of the Revenue are directed against the respective orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chennai/Salem/Madurai/Coimbatore. In some of the cases, the assessees have also filed cross-objections against the orders of the CIT(Appeals). We heard the appeals of the Revenue and the cross- objections filed by the assessee together and disposing the same by this common order.
On hearing the Ld. Departmental Representative, we find that the tax effect in these cases is less than `50 lakhs. The CBDT in its Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 increased the monetary limit for filing appeal before this Tribunal and instructed its officers to withdraw all the appeals pending before the ITAT where the tax effect is less than `50 lakhs. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that this Circular of CBDT is binding on the officers of the Department. Therefore, the Revenue cannot proceed further in these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals stand dismissed. The cross-objections filed by the assessees also stand dismissed.
In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and the cross- objections of the assessees stand dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 22nd August, 2019 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026