ITO, CHENNAI vs. SMT. A.P. JAYASHRI, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for appeals is binding on the Revenue. Therefore, the Revenue could not proceed with the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). During the hearing, it was established that the tax effect in the appeal was below the monetary limit set by the CBDT.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be withdrawn or dismissed based on the CBDT's monetary limit for appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश / O R D E R
Per S.JAYARAMAN, AM:
The Revenue filed this appeal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Chennai in dated 29.06.2016 for the assessment year 2011-12.
At the time of hearing, the Ld.AR submitted that the tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs and hence the Revenue’s appeal would be covered by the CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, fixing the Rs.50 lakhs. The Ld.DR on verification admitted that the tax effect involved in the appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs.
On hearing both sides, we find that the tax effect in this case is less than Rs. 50 lakhs. The CBDT in its Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 instructed its officers to withdraw all the appeals pending before the ITAT where the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lakhs. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that this circular of CBDT is binding on the officers of the Department. Therefore, the Revenue cannot proceed further in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 3rd September, 2019 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026