SHRI NIRMAMKRUPA NIDHI DHARMARADHAN TRUST,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-2(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
During the hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal, stating the amount involved was small. The Ld. Sr. D.R. confirmed that there was no objection to the withdrawal. Accordingly, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Shri Nirmamkrupa Nidhi Dharmaradhan Trust, filed an appeal against a rectification order passed under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Year 2019-20. The appeal challenged the disallowance of an expense amounting to Rs. 69,144/-.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against a rectification order for disallowance of expenses can be dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's request due to the small amount involved.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “SMC” BENCH
Before: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha
Assessee Represented: Withdrawal Application Revenue Represented: Shri Suresh Chand Meena, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing : 18-02-2026 Date of pronouncement : 19-02-2026 आदेश/ORDER PER: T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the appellate order dated 10-10-2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax/JCIT(Appeals), Thane arising out of the rectification order passed under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2019-20.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee vide his letter dated 17-02-2026 requested to withdraw the above appeal which states as follows: “With reference to the hearing of above referred appeal fixed on 18.02.2026, we have to request Your Honour as under. Solitary ground is regarding not allowing expense Rs. 69,144/. Being small amount, may be permitted to withdraw appeal.”
Ld. Sr. D.R. has no objection in withdrawing the above appeal.
Recording the same, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19-02-2026
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026