CHANDRAKANT PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(6), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal observed that the assessee consistently failed to appear for hearings and did not furnish any relevant materials, evidences, or a paper book to substantiate the grounds of appeal. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Chandrakant Patel, purchased various pieces of land in AY 2011-12 but did not file a Return of Income. Consequently, a notice under section 148 was issued for escapement of income. The Assessing Officer made substantial additions to the assessee's income, including amounts received as a confirming party in land sales, interest income, and unexplained share transactions, which were upheld by the CIT(A) due to lack of evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in upholding the additions made by the Assessing Officer concerning income from acting as a confirming party, interest income, and unexplained share transactions; and whether the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to challenge these additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 271(1)(c),Section 69
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “A” BENCH
Before: DR. BRR Kumar & Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar
PER: T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This appeal is filed by the Assessee as against the appellate order dated 11-06-2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, (in short referred to as “CIT(A)”), arising out of the reassessment order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2011-12. I.T.A No. 1468/Ahd/2025 A.Y. 2011-12 2 “No such pe
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026