SHRI PADMANABH SWAMI MATH DHULIA.,DHULE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the order of the CIT(E), agreeing that the trust's activities were religious and did not qualify as charitable. The ITAT noted the assessee's consistent non-appearance and failure to furnish any documentary evidence to prove charitable activities or genuineness. Consequently, the ITAT found no reason to overturn the CIT(E)'s decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Shri Padmanabh Swami Math Dhulia, appealed against the CIT(E)'s order dated 20.12.2024, which rejected its application for regular registration under Section 12A(1)(ac) of the Income Tax Act and cancelled its provisional registration. The CIT(E) found the trust's activities to be primarily religious, not charitable, and noted a lack of evidence for genuineness or charitable operations. The assessee failed to appear for multiple hearings before the ITAT, making no submissions or providing any evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for regular registration and cancelling provisional registration of the trust, given its stated religious objectives and lack of evidence for charitable activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE “B” BENCH : PUNE
Before: SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, VICE- & Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA
I.T.A.No.557/PUN/2025 Shri Padmanabh Swami CIT (Exemptions), Pune. Math Dhulia, 3492 Samadhi Mandir, Agra Road, Dule-424001, vs. Maharashtra PAN : AAJTS 7133 H (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : None For Revenue : Shri Amit Bobde, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 04.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 01.01.2026 ORDER PER ASTHA CHANDRA, JM :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune [“CIT(E)”], dated 20.12.2024 passed under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”) whereby he rejected the application for grant of regular registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac) of the Act.
When the case was called for hearing on 04.12.2025, none appeared for/on behalf of the assessee. The assessee failed to appear even on the earlier dates fixed for hearing on 23.04.2025, 01.07.2025, 22.09.2025 & 10.11.2025. The Ld. DR was present on all the above dates of hearing. Under these circumstances, we deem it fit to adjudicate the appeal with the assistance of Ld. DR and the material available on record.
2 ITA.No.557/PUN/2025 (Shri Padmanabh Swami Math Dhulia) 3. The grounds of appeal raised before us is against the findings of Ld.CIT(E) rejecting the assessee’s application for regular registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac) of the Act filed by the assessee on 26.06.2024.
4. Referring to para 6, 6.1 and 7 of the Ld. CIT(E)’s order, the Ld. DR submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) has rightly rejected the application of the assessee and also cancelled the provisional registration granted earlier by observing as under: “6. The applicant furnished response on 02/12/2024. Its submissions in response to the queries raised, particularly clause 2(i) and clause 2(vi) of the reply, have been carefully examined. It is, however, not found to be acceptable so as to prove the claim of carrying out charitable activities or to provide evidence supporting the genuineness of its operations. As per clause 2(i) of the reply, the trust admitted that its objectives are primarily religious, involving the worship of Shri Padmanabh Swami Samadhi and the performance of related religious functions. The trust has detailed routine and periodical religious ceremonies, such as daily pooja and annual events like Shri Datta Jayanti and Shri Padmanabh Swami Punyatithi. While these activities may align with the trust's objectives as stated in its deed, they are explicitly religious in nature and do not qualify as charitable activities. Further, the trust has not furnished any evidence of carrying out charitable activities that extend beyond its religious mandate, which contradicts its declaration in Form 10AB as a "charitable" trust. 6.1 In clause 2(vi), the trust claims to have uploaded bills and vouchers for the last three years on a Google Drive. However, no such submission is found on the portal. Actually, such a mode of submission is not an approved form of compliance under the procedural requirements. The trust was specifically required to furnish all relevant details and evidence through the e-filing portal. No other documentary evidence are furnished by the assessee for verification. Thus, the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of its purported activities. The trust has also failed to provide details of any charitable activities with specific dates and places, its beneficiaries or any credible evidence.
7. In view of the above, the undersigned is not satisfied about the charitable nature and the genuineness of activities of the assessee and compliance to requirements 3 ITA.No.557/PUN/2025 (Shri Padmanabh Swami Math Dhulia) of any other law for the time being in force by the trust / institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. Therefore, the application filed by the assessee is hereby rejected and the provisional registration granted on 19/03/2022 under section 12AB read with section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is hereby cancelled.
We have heard the Ld. DR and perused the order of the Ld. CIT(E). We find that the Ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application for regular registration and also cancelled the provisional registration for the reason that the activities carried out by the trust are religious activities and do not qualify as charitable activities and no details / documentary evidence has been furnished by the assessee in support of charitable nature of activities and to establish the genuineness of the activities of the assessee trust on the e-filing portal. Perusal of the order sheet entries shows that this appeal was fixed for hearing several times, however, neither any one appeared for/on behalf the assessee nor any adjournment was sought. Nothing has therefore been brought on record before us to take a contrary view than the view taken by the Ld. CIT(E). Under these circumstances, we uphold the order of the Ld. CIT(E). The grounds raised
by the assessee are accordingly dismissed.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026