RAMA AGRAWAL, DURG,DURG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-2(1), BHILAI, DURG
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issuance of a notice under Section 143(2) is a mandatory prerequisite for completing an assessment under Section 143(3) or Section 144. Failure to issue this notice vitiates the assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee's reassessment for AY 2015-16 was completed under Section 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act. The assessee argued that a mandatory notice under Section 143(2) was not issued before the assessment was finalized.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment framed under Section 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B is invalid due to the non-issuance of a mandatory notice under Section 143(2) of the Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(2),Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 142(1),Section 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- ACIT v. Hotel Blue Moon623 citing321 ITR 362 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- Ashok Chaddha v. ITO252 citing337 ITR 399 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. Silver Line201 citing283 CTR 148 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- Director of Income Tax v. Society For Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications128 citing323 ITR 249 · 2010 · HC
- Alpine Electronics Asia Pte. Ltd. v. Director General of Income Tax91 citing341 ITR 247 · 2012 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Silver Line and Anr.: 283 CTR 148 (Del), ACIT v. Hotel Blue Moon47 citing318 ITR 322 · 2009 · HC
- Shaily Juneja v. ACIT23 citing167 Taxmann.com 90 · 2024 · HC
- Hon’ble 5 Rama Agrawal v. ITO-2(1), Bhilai High Court of Delhi9 citing192 Taxmann 317 · 2010 · HC
- 148 of the Act. 13. In DIT v. Society for Worldwide Inter Bank Financial, Tele8 citing2023 SCC OnLine DEL 7382 · 2023
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi dated 10.06.2025 for the assessment year 2015-16 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
In this case, the assessee has filed both legal grounds as well as grounds on merits. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that he would assail the legal ground first and if the said legal ground is answered affirmative, then the grounds on merits shal
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026