GURUSUKH ENERGY INDIA PVT. LTD., RAIPUR,RAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), RAIPUR, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment order was passed without jurisdiction as there was no valid transfer order under Section 127 of the Act. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an assessment order. A key issue was whether the Assessing Officer had the proper jurisdiction to issue notices and complete the assessment, as there was no order of transfer under Section 127 of the Income-tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the Assessing Officer had valid jurisdiction to issue notices and pass the assessment order in the absence of a Section 127 transfer order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal713 citing469 ITR 46 · 2024 · SC · Read judgment
- Biecco Lawrie Ltd. v. State of West Bengal11 citing10 SCC 32 · 2009
- Umanath Pandey v. State of UP11 citing12 SCC 40 · 2009
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH “SMC”, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
PER PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM The present appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld.CIT(Appeals)/NFAC, dated 08.08.2025 for the assessment year 2012-13 as per the following grounds of appeal: “Ground 1-Violation of Statutory Faceless Framework That the learned Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh erred in law in issuing an appeal order under section 250 by disclosing his name, designation, and location, in cont
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 127
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30- Delhi., DelhiITA 2305/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30, DelhiITA 2304/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward 6(1), HyderabadITA 1944/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward-6(1), HyderabadITA 1943/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026