SARASWATI SHISHU MANDIR MANAGING COMMITTEE,PURI vs. COMMISSIONER-OF-INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(Exemption) had provided multiple opportunities to the assessee, but the assessee failed to appear or provide the required documentation. The Tribunal acknowledged the ex-parte nature of the order and, in the interest of justice, decided to set aside the orders.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application ex-parte due to non-prosecution, despite several opportunities given to the assessee. The assessee then appealed to the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12AB by the CIT(Exemption) was justified due to the assessee's failure to prosecute the application, and if the matter should be remitted for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA-CUTTACK ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-(KZ) & Shri Rakesh Mishra
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
order : May 27, 2025 O R D E R Per Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-President (KZ):- The present appeals bearing and 122/CTK/2025 are directed at the instance of assessee against the (A.Y. 2025-2026) Saraswati Sishu Mandir Managing Committee orders of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Hyderabad dated 9th December, 2024 and 11th December, 2024 respectively passed for Assessment Year 2025-26 on the application of the assessee filed in Form No. 10AB for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. In other words, the ld. CIT(Exemption) has rejected the application of the assessee for grant of registration under section 12AB on account of non-prosecution of the application. .
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Charitable Trust and engaged in various charitable activities. Notices were issued in respect of proceedings under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act to the address of the assessee mentioned in the Form No. 10AB to produce the copy of Memorandum of Association/Trust Deed for verification and to furnish a detailed reply on the specific information called for in the said notices. In response to the notices, the assessee-Trust submitted partial information only. Thereafter notice dated 12.11.2024 was issued to the assessee as a final opportunity to submit the other information also along with the reply to the above notice including relevant documentary evidences i.e. copy of latest three months GST returns, list of donors in respect of 80G claim, furnishing the documentary evidences with regard to expenditure incurred for the objectives as per Trust Deed/Memorandum of Association., but there was no compliance to the notices.
(A.Y. 2025-2026) Saraswati Sishu Mandir Managing Committee 3. The ld. CIT(Exemption) has given several opportunities to the assessee to substantiate its claim, but the appellant neither filed the written submission nor represented the case before the ld. CIT(Exemption). The ld. CIT(Exemption) passed the ex-parte orders dated 09.12.2024 and 11.12.2024 dismissing the appeals of the assessee.
Dissatisfied with the decision of the ld. CIT(Exemption), the assessee preferred appeals before the Tribunal.
At the time of hearing, ld. Counsel for the assessee prayed before the Bench that the impugned orders be set aside and remitted back to the file of ld. CIT(Exemption) for deciding it afresh.
The ld. D.R., on the other hand, submitted that the assessee should be more vigilant about its obligation towards prosecuting income tax proceedings. He argued to uphold the orders passed by the ld. CIT(Exemption).
We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. The impugned orders are ex-parte order wherein application of the assessee for grant of registration under section 12AB have been rejected for want of prosecution. In the interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to set aside the orders and remit the issue to the ld. CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication.
(A.Y. 2025-2026) Saraswati Sishu Mandir Managing Committee 8. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 27/05/2025.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026